Phase 0-2: Schema cleanup, typed relations, event-driven automation
- Phase 0: AGENTS.md cleanup (dedup quotes, renumber sections, merge qmd) - Phase 1: typed relations (manage-relations.py, graph-search.py, check-staleness.py, detect-conflicts.py) - Phase 2: frontmatter validator, weekly lint, knowledge promotion, git hooks - Fix .gitignore to track tools/ and .githooks/ - Fix git remote URL (remove plaintext token) - New wiki pages: 504 pages, 34 raw sources
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
|
||||
# LEARNINGS.md - 教育AI研究项目学习记录
|
||||
|
||||
> 本文件记录项目执行中发现的知识增量、最佳实践和经验总结。
|
||||
> 晋升规则:同一 Pattern-Key 出现 ≥3 次 → 写入 MEMORY.md
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260420-A01] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-20T12:39:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: high
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
北师大AI教育研究中心提供免费高质量PDF
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
形态层级论文(卢宇/汤筱玙)可从 `aic-fe.bnu.edu.cn` 域名获取高质量PDF直链,文件2.5MB,内容完整。优于其他来源。
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
今后优先从 `aic-fe.bnu.edu.cn`、`hanspub.org` 等开放平台获取中文教育类论文PDF。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: pdf_source.edu_china_bnu
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-20
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-20
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260420-A02
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260420-A02] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-20T12:39:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: medium
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
北师大AI教育研究中心域名格式
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
格式:`https://aic-fe.bnu.edu.cn/docs/YYYY-MM/文件名.pdf`
|
||||
论文发布日期与路径日期不一定一致,需用搜索确认实际URL。
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
通过百度学术/CrossRef确认论文后,搜索 `site:aic-fe.bnu.edu.cn PDF` 找直链。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: pdf_source_pattern.bnu_aic_fe
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-20
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-20
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260420-A01
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260425-A01] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-25T16:30:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: high
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
文献质量评估的7维度评估体系效果良好
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
本次采用7个维度评估文献质量,总分105分制:
|
||||
1. 时效性(15分):发表时间越新,得分越高
|
||||
2. 信源权威性(20分):期刊/信源权威性
|
||||
3. 数据质量(20分):数据完整性、清晰度、量化程度
|
||||
4. 方法严谨性(20分):研究方法科学性、规范性
|
||||
5. 实证基础(20分):实证数据质量、样本量、效应量
|
||||
6. 理论框架(15分):理论框架完整性、清晰度
|
||||
7. 影响力(15分):引用量、期刊影响因子、政策影响
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
今后文献质量评估继续使用此7维度体系,保持评估标准的一致性。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: literature_quality_assessment.7_dimensions
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260425-A02
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260425-A02] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-25T16:30:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: high
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
批量处理文献的策略:分优先级提高效率
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
本次评估38篇文献,采用分优先级策略:
|
||||
1. **A+级/A级文献**(优先级最高):详细评估每篇,生成独立评估报告
|
||||
2. **B级文献**(中优先级):精简评估,生成批评估报告
|
||||
3. **C级文献**(低优先级):暂不详细评估,记录基本信息即可
|
||||
|
||||
此策略在保证质量的前提下,大幅提高了处理效率。
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
今后批量处理文献时,继续采用分优先级策略(A+→A→B→C),优先保证高质量文献的详细评估。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: literature_processing.priority_based
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260425-A01
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260425-A03] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-25T16:30:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: medium
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
统一的评估报告模板可以提高一致性和效率
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
本次为7篇A+级文献生成了详细的评估报告,使用统一的模板结构:
|
||||
- 文献基本信息(标题、作者、来源、年份)
|
||||
- 质量评估得分(总分及各维度得分)
|
||||
- 核心发现与价值
|
||||
- 适用场景与使用建议
|
||||
|
||||
模板化处理大幅提高了生成效率和报告一致性。
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
今后评估报告继续使用统一模板,确保信息结构和格式的一致性。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: assessment_report.unified_template
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260425-A02
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [LRN-20260425-A04] best_practice
|
||||
|
||||
**Logged**: 2026-04-25T16:30:00+08:00
|
||||
**Priority**: medium
|
||||
**Status**: pending
|
||||
**Area**: docs
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
批评估报告适用于中低质量文献
|
||||
|
||||
### Details
|
||||
本次对10篇剩余文献(B级、C级)采用了批评估报告模式,在一个文件中记录所有文献的基本信息和评估结果。此模式适用于:
|
||||
- 文献数量较多(>10篇)
|
||||
- 质量等级较低(B级、C级)
|
||||
- 时间预算有限
|
||||
|
||||
批评估报告包含:文献ID、标题、质量等级、简要评语。
|
||||
|
||||
### Suggested Action
|
||||
今后遇到类似情况(大量中低质量文献),优先使用批评估报告模式,提高效率。
|
||||
|
||||
### Metadata
|
||||
- Source: conversation
|
||||
- Pattern-Key: batch_assessment_report
|
||||
- Recurrence-Count: 1
|
||||
- First-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- Last-Seen: 2026-04-25
|
||||
- See Also: LRN-20260425-A02
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user